Bonus: At the end of the article, look for the Validation Spreadsheet that I developed specifically to save you a lot of time and money and find the best developer for your project.
# 1 Choose the development partner
Anyone who thinks about developing software with the help of third-party developers will probably end up with 3 options:
- Hire freelancers
- Build an in-house team
- Sign a contract with a software house
All these options have their pros and cons. Let’s take a closer look and find out which option will be the best fit for your project.
These guys are lone wolves who have made code the meaning of their lives. But ... Not all of them and not always.
- Low cost of services
It's true. They do not pay taxes or insurance (unless they have legal grounds for professional activities), so they can afford to lower their hourly rate.
- No need for formal employment
Do not hire, so do not have to fire. No severance pay or other formalities. It is counted.
- No need to equip a workplace
In general, a freelancer always seems to be a carefree dude who has a cup of coffee in one hand and a laptop for work in the other. So, you don’t have to buy expensive equipment and organize a workspace for this guy.
- Good for clear, fast tasks
I think everything is clear here. If you have in mind - complex software with costing, a large amount of data, etc., then read on.
- Lack of contractor liability
Unfortunately, there are few organized people, and even fewer self-organized people. There is always a risk that the freelancer will run out of inspiration and then the project will be in jeopardy.
- Failure to meet deadlines
There can be many reasons - from banal emotional burnout (when you are tired of doing what you need), to force majeure circumstances like illness.
- Lack of skills needed
Freelancer's knowledge is limited by the brain of one person. And that is a fact. It is unlikely that you will be able to meet a freelancer who has knowledge of front and back development, knows how to write mobile applications and at the same time understands servers well.
- Loss of control over workflow. Once again about everything that is written above. Failure to comply with deadlines, lack of high-quality feedback plus errors in task planning - all this makes it very difficult to control the workflow.
- Privacy breach risk
When working on a project, a freelancer inevitably gets access to various company databases, as this is often necessary for work. And who knows how he uses this data in the future …
Your own development team, which is always ready to plunge headlong into the problems and tasks of the company. Or not? Let's take a look.
- All control is inside the company
Since the project is carried out by its own employees, all the control, constant monitoring and the ability to change the course of the project are in the hands of the head of the company.
- Higher level of data security
The risk of leakage of secret data through its own employees is indeed much lower than in the case when third parties work with this info. But this, unfortunately, happens. This is even more offensive.
- Faster communication
Of course, discussing the critical stages of development is easier by going to the next office than waiting for an answer, say, from another continent. No argument.
- Flexibility and time saving
Any changes in the project as well as requirements can be made as soon as possible.
- Constant and substantial costs
All the costs of maintaining your employees are naturally on your back. Monthly payments of salaries, taxes and insurance plus sick leave, incentives and bonuses, etc. Seriously, this is a lot of money.
- Hiring is a time-consuming process
I am sure you want good specialists to work on the project. Headhunting them will not be so easy. But that is not all. Professionals are expensive. In addition, they still need to be lured to their team with something interesting and exciting.
- Technology requirements
Development requires a wide range of knowledge in various fields. If your engineers do not have them, then work gaps can be expected. Who to blame? I will leave unanswered.
- Staff turnover
If someone from the internal IT team suddenly decides to quit right in the midst of the project (and this happens), finding a replacement will be a real challenge. It’s not worth talking about the deadlines and unforeseen expenses that will accompany this.
These are professionals with extensive experience in developing cool software and its subsequent support.
- Reduced overhead costs
No costs associated with the operation of serious equipment, the use of expensive software and technologies, as well as staff training. All this is the responsibility of the outsourcing partner.
- Reduced labor costs
Most likely, you will agree that it is not always more profitable to keep permanent employees on your staff than to pay third-party developers if necessary without losing quality.
- No long-term commitment
Special outsourcing agreements are concluded with the outsourcing partner, which has clear terms of cooperation, terms of performance and terms of payment. Such an agreement is of a fixed nature and depends entirely on the needs of the customer.
- A wide selection of professionals
A professional software development firm has in-house employees with relevant qualifications, tests and enhances the skills of its employees. So the customer gets quality assurances.
- No license obligations
When choosing outsourcing, an organization does not need to worry about acquiring the necessary tools and technologies for development and associated licensing costs. This is completely the responsibility of the outsourcer.
- Costs & expertise balance
This is once again about money. When you outsource a project, you know for sure that specialists in their field will work on it for a fixed amount in the contract.
- Well-established workflows
Qualified developers always try to make the process of developing a software product as convenient as possible. They use different workflow or integrated Business Process Management systems to increase efficiency and improve the organization of work
- Risk of picking wrong company
Here the advantage of a wide selection of professionals turns the other side of the coin. Unfortunately, there is a chance of running into the wrong company. The good news is that this can be avoided. Just read the article to the end.
- Communication and time zones difficulties
Cultural, linguistic and location differences can really hinder effective collaboration. This minus can be minimized if you use universal English for communication and adjust to each other's work schedules.
- Legal Pitfalls
Unfortunately, there is always a risk of information leakage when the data is accessed by a third party. This can be avoided by paying due attention to the relevant points of the cooperation contract.
# 2 Checking Information Sources
Here I will focus on the main sources that can complement (or spoil) the general overview of the service provider.
Check whether your potential partner is so good in the developer segment that he already is in the top 10, 20 ... of the best developer companies. How?
I’m going to focus on trusted review sites such as GoodFirms, Appfutura or Clutch.co (links below). Do you think the reviews are important? Yes! What about rates? Definitely important. These platforms confirm the identity of the reviewer.
Continuing the conversation, I’ll say - check the social networks (Linkedin, GitHub, Facebook). It's the shortest way to check company's culture, content and comments.
One more thing
Don’t discount the omniscient Google. Google carefully stores information about everything. Enter the name of the company or, say, its CEO, and enjoy the results.
# 3 Check response time for inquiry
Next it’s time to chat to a potential outsource partner (or maybe there are few of them for now). You can leave a request for cooperation, ask them to clarify some information, make a request for a preliminary calculation of the cost of the project, or ask any other questions about the company.
Pay attention to how they respond and how fast they do it. It should always be clear and thorough. Usually it should not exceed 24 hours. If there is a contact form on site response should be even faster.
Important indicator of transparency and overall performance is the speed at which the service provider responds to customer wishes and comments.
Response time is possible to check by several metrics:
Reply via email or webform:
- up to 1 hour - perfect
- up to 24 hours - Ok
- more than 24 hours - oops, it’s too long...
Chat Form - honestly, it should be immediate, or at least not more than 5 mins